As 10 melhores ferramentas de entrevistas com IA analisadas em 2026

Avaliação do melhor software de entrevistas com IA

1. 

   1

   candidate.fyi

   Best for branded candidate experiences

   • Free demo available
   • Pricing upon request

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:4/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   Candidate.fyi helps enterprise recruiting teams reduce manual interview scheduling, coordination delays, and candidate communication gaps. The platform combines AI-powered scheduling, automated reminders, interview intelligence, and branded candidate portals to create a smoother hiring experience for candidates, recruiters, and hiring teams.

   Who Is candidate.fyi Best For?

   candidate.fyi is a strong fit for enterprise recruiting and talent acquisition teams that manage high volumes of interviews across multiple interviewers, roles, and hiring stages.

   Why I Picked Candidate.fyi

   I picked candidate.fyi because it gives enterprise recruiting teams more control over the candidate-facing experience. Its branded candidate portal lets you apply your company’s visual identity, tone of voice, and templates across interview confirmations, prep materials, reminders, and schedule updates. This makes it a strong fit for teams that want every candidate touchpoint to feel consistent and on-brand. I also like that it supports multi-brand setups, which is useful for larger companies managing multiple hiring entities or employer brands. Its experience intelligence layer adds another layer of visibility by tracking candidate engagement signals and flagging at-risk candidates before they lose momentum.

   Candidate.fyi Key Features

   • AI interview scheduling: Automatically books individual, panel, and multi-stage interview loops based on calendar availability, interview rules, and team preferences.
   • Automated candidate communication: Sends confirmations, reminders, prep materials, and schedule updates so candidates know what to expect at each stage.
   • Interview intelligence: Captures interview notes, summaries, and structured feedback to help hiring teams review candidate signals faster.
   • Feedback coverage tracking: Monitors feedback completion and timeliness so recruiters can spot missing interviewer input before decisions stall.

   Candidate.fyi Integrations

   Integrations include Workday, Greenhouse, Lever, iCIMS, SmartRecruiters, UKG Pro Recruiting, Google Calendar, Outlook, Zoom, and Slack.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Heavy automation may require careful workflow setup and oversight
   • Tracks feedback completion to reduce stalled hiring decisions
   • Best suited for enterprise teams, not simple hiring workflows

   Cons:

   • Automates complex panels, loops, and multi-stage interview scheduling
   • Branded portals keep candidates informed with prep and updates
   Learn more about candidate.fyi:

   • Check out candidate.fyi on their website
2. 

   2

   VidCruiter

   Best for high-volume Enterprise hiring

   • Free demo available
   • Price upon request

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:4.7/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   VidCruiter is an AI interview software platform for employers that brings together AI-powered video interviewing, automated candidate assessments, customizable workflows, and digital interview management tools.

   Who Is VidCruiter Best For?

   VidCruiter is a strong fit for mid-to-large organizations with high-volume hiring needs and structured interview processes across multiple teams or locations.

   Why I Picked VidCruiter

   I've included VidCruiter in my top picks because its scheduling automation genuinely removes the back-and-forth that bogs down high-volume Enterprise hiring teams. Interviewers connect their calendars once, and VidCruiter surfaces only the timeslots that meet your pre-configured availability rules, no manual coordination needed. I especially like the self-serve rescheduling feature, which lets candidates reschedule through an embedded link rather than emailing a recruiter, and the automatic SMS and email reminders that keep both sides accountable without any follow-up work.

   VidCruiter Key Features

   • AI interview notes and summaries: VidCruiter automatically transcribes candidate responses and generates AI-powered summaries of completed interviews, so evaluators can review key points without rewatching recordings in full.
   • Structured interview scorecards: Built-in digital scorecards let interviewers rate each candidate's responses against predefined, job-specific competency criteria directly within the platform during the interview.
   • Live and pre-recorded video interviewing: VidCruiter supports both one-way pre-recorded video interviews and live structured video interviews, giving teams flexibility in how they screen candidates at different hiring stages.
   • Interview compliance tools: VidCruiter tracks and enforces interview process adherence across your hiring team, flagging deviations from structured workflows to support legal defensibility and fair hiring practices.

   VidCruiter Integrations

   VidCruiter offers native integrations with Greenhouse, iCIMS, Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG, and Oracle. It also supports API access for custom integrations.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Digital reference checking with automated workflows
   • Built-in interviewer training and calibration tools
   • Custom video introductions for branded experiences

   Cons:

   • Interview recording access subject to plan level
   • Limited transparency on AI evaluation features
   Learn more about VidCruiter:

   • Check out VidCruiter on their website
   • Read my in-depth review of VidCruiter
3. 

   3

   Joveo

   Best for end-to-end agentic recruiting automation

   • Free demo available
   • Pricing upon request

   Visit Website

   

   Joveo is an agentic recruiting platform that combines AI-powered interviewing, programmatic job advertising, conversational candidate screening, automated scoring, and ATS-integrated analytics into a single end-to-end hiring suite.

   Who Is Joveo Best For?

   Joveo is a strong fit for enterprise TA teams, RPOs, and staffing firms that need to screen and interview candidates at high volume across multiple roles simultaneously.

   Why I Picked Joveo

   Joveo earns its spot on my shortlist because it's the only tool I've tested where the AI interviewer genuinely adapts mid-conversation. When a candidate's answer is vague, the AI probes further with a contextually relevant follow-up, not a scripted question. I also like that scoring, transcripts, and hiring recommendations sync directly to the ATS the moment an interview ends, so nothing sits in a separate tool waiting to be manually transferred.

   Joveo Key Features

   • Programmatic job advertising: Automates job ad placements and optimizes spend across multiple sources from a single dashboard.
   • AI-powered career sites: Lets teams build branded, personalized career sites and landing pages with rapid deployment.
   • Omnichannel candidate engagement: Delivers interview invitations and updates through web, phone, and WhatsApp to reach diverse candidate pools.
   • ATS write-back: Sends interview scores, summaries, and transcripts directly into major applicant tracking systems automatically.

   Joveo Integrations

   Joveo offers native integrations with more than 100 applicant tracking systems, including iCIMS, Greenhouse, Workday, Bullhorn, SAP SuccessFactors, Oracle Recruiting Cloud, and Cornerstone. An API is available for custom integrations.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • End-to-end automation from sourcing to scoring
   • Handles high-volume screening across roles
   • AI adapts follow-up questions mid-interview

   Cons:

   • Onboarding requires significant configuration
   • Reporting dashboards lack depth for enterprise
   Learn more about Joveo:

   • Check out Joveo on their website
4. 

   4

   Manatal

   Best with AI-driven candidate profile enrichment

   • 14-day free trial + free demo available
   • From $15/user/month (billed annually)

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:4.8/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   Manatal is an AI-native ATS with a built-in AI Interviewer that autonomously conducts asynchronous video screenings, transcribes responses, and scores candidates against structured, role-specific criteria.

   Who Is Manatal Best For?

   Manatal suits recruitment agencies and in-house talent teams that handle high-volume hiring across multiple regions or job boards simultaneously.

   Why I Picked Manatal

   Manatal earns its spot on my shortlist because the AI-driven profile enrichment pulls data from 20+ platforms like LinkedIn and GitHub before a single interview question is asked. That means the AI Interviewer can auto-generate role-specific questions built around a richer, more complete picture of each candidate. I also like how the platform delivers automated assessment summaries with strengths, weaknesses, and fit scores tied to structured rubrics.

   Manatal Key Features

   • AI Note-Taker: Automatically transcribes and summarizes live calls or interviews for easy reference.
   • Workflow automation: Handles repetitive candidate communications and status updates based on user-defined triggers.
   • Open API and Zapier integration: Allows seamless data flow to HRIS, payroll, and productivity platforms.
   • Multilingual interviewing: Conducts and analyzes interviews in languages like English, French, German, Spanish, Italian, and Portuguese.

   Manatal Integrations

   Manatal offers native integrations with Gmail, Outlook, Microsoft 365, Microsoft Teams, LinkedIn Recruiter, and GitHub. It also supports Zapier and provides an API for custom integrations.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • AI Interviewer runs async screenings autonomously
   • Automated scoring uses role-specific rubrics
   • AI enriches profiles from 20+ social sources

   Cons:

   • Analytics dashboards lack depth for enterprise
   • Limited bias audit documentation versus rivals
   Learn more about Manatal:

   • Check out Manatal on their website
   • Read my in-depth review of Manatal
   • Explore best alternatives to Manatal
5. 

   5

   Humanly

   Best for structured candidate screening

   • Free demo available
   • Pricing upon request

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:4.8/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   Humanly stands out to me for how it brings structured candidate screening into real candidate conversations. I like that you can set up custom question sets for interviews and let Humanly run and score them consistently across every applicant.

   Teams who want unbiased, scalable screening without a ton of handholding tend to rely on Humanly’s automated processes. The interview transcripts and structured scoring make comparing batches of candidates way easier, which I appreciate when working with high-volume hiring.

   Humanly’s Best For

   • Recruiters who need consistent, unbiased candidate screening
   • High-volume hiring teams focused on structured interviews

   Humanly’s Not Great For

   • Small organizations running mostly informal interviews
   • Teams needing deep, technical skill assessments

   What sets Humanly apart

   Humanly is all about bringing logic and fairness to screening interviews by following a question and scoring system you set up in advance. Unlike conversational bots like Paradox or chat-focused tools, Humanly expects you to define criteria up front and then let the system scale it across every candidate conversation.

   In practice, this works best when you want standardized candidate experiences and reliable data for comparing applicants batch by batch.

   Tradeoffs with Humanly

   Humanly optimizes for consistency and structure, but you lose flexibility to improvise or dig deeper in the moment. That makes truly open-ended, rapport-driven interviews harder to pull off.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Works well for high-volume hiring
   • Makes interview setup automatic
   • Lets you screen all applicants quickly

   Cons:

   • Takes time to customize questions
   • AI summaries can miss context
   Learn more about Humanly:

   • Check out Humanly on their website
6. 

   6

   Puck

   Best for SMS-powered AI phone screening

   • Free demo available
   • From $300/month (billed annually)

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:5/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   Puck's AI Recruiter is an AI interview platform that conducts asynchronous, conversational, phone-based candidate screenings via SMS or email invite, with automated scoring, transcription, and support for 33+ languages.

   Who Is Puck Best For?

   Recruiting teams at startups, staffing agencies, and high-volume employers hiring for hourly or frontline roles will get the most out of this tool.

   Why I Picked Puck

   Puck's AI Recruiter earns its spot on my shortlist because of how it handles screening through SMS-initiated phone conversations rather than video. Candidates get a text, tap a link, and complete a real two-way AI conversation on their own schedule, with no app, no camera, and no calendar invite required. I also like that the AI adapts its questions based on what candidates actually say, and flags potential fraud by surfacing inconsistencies across the conversation.

   Puck Key Features

   • Multilingual interview support: Candidates can complete phone interviews in over 33 languages.
   • ATS integrations: Connects natively with Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby, Workday, iCIMS, and more.
   • Automated transcription and scoring: Every interview is transcribed and scored using AI against structured, auditable rubrics.
   • Fraud detection engine: Identifies inconsistencies in responses to flag potential application or identity fraud.

   Puck Integrations

   Puck's AI Recruiter offers native integrations with Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby, Pinpoint, Workday, and iCIMS. Puck also offers its own Lightweight ATS that incorporates the AI Recruiter.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • AI dynamically adapts follow-up questions mid-interview
   • Conducts interviews in 33+ languages natively
   • No app download required from candidates

   Cons:

   • Not built for structured competency-based assessments
   • No video interview format supported
   Learn more about Puck:

   • Check out Puck on their website
7. 

   7

   Screenz

   Best for customizable talent evaluation flows

   • Free trial + free demo available
   • From $749/month (billed annually)

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:4.9/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   Screenz is an AI interview platform that conducts adaptive, role-specific candidate interviews, scores applicants against defined criteria, and delivers ranked shortlists with transcripts and built-in integrity detection.

   Who Is Screenz Best For?

   Screenz is a good fit for talent acquisition teams at mid-to-large organizations that screen high volumes of candidates across multiple roles simultaneously.

   Why I Picked Screenz

   I've included Screenz in my top picks because the level of control it gives you over how evaluations are structured is genuinely unusual for an AI interview tool. You define the role criteria, and Screenz builds the question set around them, then scores every candidate's answers against those exact benchmarks. What I especially like is the adaptive follow-up layer: the AI probes deeper when an answer is thin, so you're not left with surface-level responses to make decisions on. The integrity detection layer adds another dimension, flagging suspicious patterns so your shortlist reflects real candidate capability.

   Screenz Key Features

   • Ranked candidate shortlists: Screenz automatically ranks candidates by score after each interview round, with full transcripts attached to each profile.
   • Intelligence loop: The AI learns from your actual hiring decisions over time, refining how it scores and ranks future candidates for similar roles.
   • Post-hire check-ins: Screenz sends automated check-ins after a hire is made to capture retention signals and feed that data back into future evaluations.
   • Asynchronous interview delivery: Candidates complete interviews on their own schedule, without requiring a recruiter to be present or available in real time.

   Screenz Integrations

   Screenz offers 64+ ATS integrations, including Greenhouse, Workday, iCIMS, Lever, BambooHR, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG Pro, Bullhorn, JazzHR, and Workable. These connect via API, so interview scores, transcripts, and rankings flow directly back into your existing ATS as notes without changing your workflow.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Supports 33 languages for candidate interviews
   • Post-hire check-ins track retention signals
   • Built-in AI-generated cheat detection scoring

   Cons:

   • No live two-way interview capability
   • Entry pricing may exclude smaller teams
   Learn more about Screenz:

   • Check out Screenz on their website
   • Read my in-depth review of Screenz
8. 

   8

   Metaview

   Best for interview analytics

   • Free plan available
   • From $100/user/month

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:4.8/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   Metaview makes my list because it specializes in giving you detailed, actionable analytics from your interview process. When I tested conversation intelligence features, I saw how you can uncover hidden trends in both candidate responses and interviewer behavior.

   I really appreciate how Metaview auto-generates insight-rich transcripts and highlights recurring themes that would be tough to catch manually. This is especially useful for teams who want data-backed feedback to improve interviews, hiring quality, and candidate experience.

   Metaview’s Best For

   • Talent teams that want detailed interview analytics
   • Organizations looking to improve interviewer performance with data

   Metaview’s Not Great For

   • Small companies with simple or low interview volume
   • Teams wanting in-depth candidate skill assessment tools

   What sets Metaview apart

   Metaview approaches the interview process like a real data exercise, not just a meeting to transcribe. Unlike Google Meet or Zoom’s native recording tools, it pulls interviewer and candidate behavior into clear focus, generating reports that tell you how interviews are progressing over time. This tends to work best for teams that want to drive interview quality using trends and moment-by-moment feedback, instead of relying on surface-level notes or gut instinct.

   Tradeoffs with Metaview

   Metaview optimizes for interview analytics, but by focusing on what happens in real conversations, it doesn’t handle skills assessment or testing workflows, so hiring teams need a separate tool for technical screens.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Easier coaching and feedback
   • Consistent interviewing process
   • Auto transcription saves time

   Cons:

   • Few export options
   • Needs manual transcript review
   Learn more about Metaview:

   • Check out Metaview on their website
   • Read my in-depth review of Metaview
9. 

   9

   Lever

   Best for collaborative hiring

   • Free demo available
   • Pricing upon request

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:4.3/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   Lever stands out to me when hiring is truly a team sport. I picked it because it does more than automate interview scheduling and scorecards—it centers collaboration right inside the platform. What I appreciate is how Lever lets interviewers, recruiters, and hiring managers share candidate feedback directly and transparently, without endless back-and-forth emails.

   If hiring decisions are high-stakes and you want everyone to feel ownership, you’ll find Lever makes it easy to keep every stakeholder in sync as interviews progress.

   Lever's Best For

   • Collaborative hiring across multiple departments and stakeholders
   • Organizations prioritizing feedback and visibility during interviews

   Lever's Not Great For

   • Solo recruiters or very small hiring teams
   • Companies needing advanced AI-based chat or video interviewing

   What sets Lever apart

   Lever takes a conversation-first approach to hiring and treats everyone involved as part of the process, not just the recruiters. Instead of siloed feedback or disconnected interview documentation like you get with older applicant tracking systems, Lever surfaces each person's input in one place. It feels closer to working in Slack than the rigid structure of Taleo or iCIMS.

   Tradeoffs with Lever

   Lever optimizes for shared input and collaborative decision-making, but this can mean you lose some depth in specialized AI interview features or automation compared to tools focused solely on candidate assessments.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Tracks candidate progress
   • Easy data access
   • Customizable workflows

   Cons:

   • Complicated permissions setup
   • Some automation errors on updates
   Learn more about Lever:

   • Check out Lever on their website
10. 

    10

    HireVue

    Best for global scalability

    • Free demo available
    • Pricing upon request

    Visit Website

    Customer Rating:4.5/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

    

    HireVue lands on my shortlist for its ability to serve enterprise teams hiring across multiple countries and regions. I see global HR leads rely on it for structured, AI-driven video interviews at volume, including language support and custom role-based assessments.

    I like how HireVue handles local compliance and candidate experience in dozens of markets. The scalability and breadth of assessment options make it a strong choice when you need to standardize hiring worldwide.

    HireVue’s Best For

    • Enterprise and multinational HR teams hiring at scale
    • Organizations that need AI-driven, standardized global interviews

    HireVue’s Not Great For

    • Small businesses with low interview volume
    • Teams wanting simple, non-video interview workflows

    What sets HireVue apart

    HireVue expects you to run high-volume, standardized interviews across different regions without needing separate tools per country. Instead of taking an applicant-by-applicant approach like Spark Hire or Interviewer.AI, it builds in structured, automated interviewing and diverse assessment types to meet compliance needs at scale. I find this fits best when teams want predictable, repeatable steps for every candidate.

    Tradeoffs with HireVue

    HireVue optimizes for scale and process standardization, which limits customization of interview formats or workflows. If your team values highly personalized or varied interview experiences, you lose some of that flexibility.

    Pros and Cons

    Pros:

    • Strong data protection
    • Available in multiple languages
    • Supports large-scale hiring processes

    Cons:

    • No free trial available
    • Needs clearer AI scoring
    Learn more about HireVue:

    • Check out HireVue on their website
    • Read my in-depth review of HireVue