Skip to main content
Key Takeaways

Recruitment Woes: Job seekers are often left frustrated as modern recruitment processes have become increasingly complex and draining.

Ghosting is the New Norm: Job seekers often find themselves in a communication black hole, where employers fail to provide feedback or updates, leading to feelings of uncertainty and disappointment.

Tech Troubles: Advancements in recruitment technology are meant to streamline processes, but can complicate them further if implementation is poor, leaving candidates frustrated with automated systems that lack a personal touch.

It’s 2024, and if you’ve been on the job hunt recently, you might have noticed something unsettling: modern recruitment processes have started to suck the life out of job seekers. 

I’m talking inefficient systems, drawn-out interviews, and an increasing demand for applicants to jump through hoops only to find out the job was never really available in the first place. This phenomenon is called "Vampire Recruitment." Like vampires of legend drain blood, these recruitment practices drain candidates' energy, enthusiasm, and time—with little (or no) reward.

In this article, I’ll examine how modern recruitment has become a soul-sucking endeavor, from ghost jobs to multi-round interview marathons. I’ll also provide insights into how HR leaders can recognize these draining practices and offer actionable solutions to breathe life back into the hiring process.

The Rise Of The ‘Ghost Job’ Hauntings

One of the most frustrating aspects of modern recruitment is the proliferation of so-called "ghost jobs"—positions that companies post but never intend to fill. These phantom job listings create false hope and waste valuable time for job seekers. Candidates often apply to dozens of positions only to hear radio silence in return, leaving them wondering if the job ever existed in the first place.

According to a recent article from Fortune, recruiters have been increasingly posting ghost jobs, either to keep their pipeline active or simply to hedge against a future hiring need. 

In some cases, companies have been accused of posting jobs that they never intended to be filled to create a perception that the business is growing. This misleading tactic not only wastes the candidate’s time, but also damages the company’s reputation. 

Ghost jobs don’t just haunt the job seeker—they undermine trust in the hiring process itself. For HR leaders, identifying and eliminating ghost jobs should be a priority. A transparent and respectful recruitment process can go a long way toward building a positive employer brand. 

Redundant Application Processes

If you’ve recently filled out an online job application, you’ve likely noticed redundancies. Lengthy, inefficient fields that ask for excessive information or require manual data entry—often repeating what’s already on your resume—have become all too common. 

By the time candidates reach the end, they’re exhausted and questioning whether the job is worth the trouble.

This over-complicated application process is a prime example of vampire recruitment in action. Rather than streamlining the experience, many companies have bogged it down with outdated practices that suck time and energy. 

According to a September UK jobs report, many job seekers abandon applications halfway through simply because they’re too arduous.

HR leaders should reevaluate their recruiting tools and processes. The whole point in adopting modern recruiting software or using applicant tracking systems is for organizations to reduce friction and show they value applicants’ time. This not only creates a more positive first impression, but also aligns with contemporary job seekers’ expectations for efficient digital experiences.

Get weekly insights and how-tos on leadership and HR’s biggest and most pressing topics—right to your inbox.

Get weekly insights and how-tos on leadership and HR’s biggest and most pressing topics—right to your inbox.

The 5+ Round Interview Gauntlet

Now it’s time for interviews, which are intimidating. Many employers are piling on endless rounds of interviews for candidates to endure. It’s not uncommon for processes to include five, six, or even more rounds of interviews. And we’re not just talking about conversations—some involve take-home assignments or pre-employment tests, detailed presentations, or full-on projects that could take days to complete.

For job seekers who are currently employed, dedicating this much time to an interview task is unrealistic. Many are seeking a new role because they feel their work-life balance is skewed in the wrong direction; finding the time to squeeze in multiple interviews and extensive unpaid work around an already hectic schedule is simply not an option for them.

At what point does this cross the line from “thorough vetting” to “unreasonable demand”? Research from INSEAD suggests that multiple rounds of interviews don’t always correlate with better hires and can deter top talent from pursuing the role. After all, if a company demands a week’s worth of unpaid work just to get through the door, what will working there be like?

HR professionals must balance evaluating candidates thoroughly with respecting their time and effort. Stop scaring off great talent by asking them to run a marathon when a 5K would do just fine!

The Free Labor Trap: Extensive Pre-Hire Work

Imagine pouring hours of your life into a project or assignment only to be ghosted by the company you applied to. This isn’t a bad dream—it’s a reality for many candidates. 

Some organizations have taken the practice of asking for pre-hire work to the extreme, requiring detailed presentations, business plans, or code reviews without any compensation for the candidate’s effort.

This “free labor” practice is one of the more egregious forms of vampire recruitment. It’s one thing to ask for a small task that showcases a candidate’s skills; it’s another to demand full-blown projects without offering compensation or clarity on next steps. 

In many cases, candidates are left wondering if their work is being used for the company’s gain, without even a thank you in return. 

HR leaders should rethink how they assess candidates. If a take-home assignment is truly necessary, it should be brief, relevant, and followed up on promptly. Transparency is key—candidates deserve to know exactly what’s expected and how their work will be used.

Tips For Slaying Vampire Recruitment

So, how do HR leaders slay these energy-sucking practices and bring some humanity back into recruitment? It starts with recognizing the key pain points we’ve discussed—ghost jobs, inefficient application processes, over-the-top interview demands, and unpaid pre-hire work. 

Streamlining application systems with the right recruiting software eliminates unnecessary interview rounds, and being transparent about expectations are steps in the right direction. Respect for candidates ultimately translates into better hiring outcomes and stronger employer branding.

Here are some actionable steps to banish vampire recruitment practices and put the candidate experience back at the heart of your hiring strategy:

1. Enhance Communication and Transparency

Keep candidates informed at every stage of the hiring process. Set clear expectations about timelines, the number of interview rounds, and what will be required from them. Provide regular updates, even if it’s just to say that the process is taking longer than expected.

Lack of communication is one of the most prominent frustrations candidates face. By being transparent and communicative, you create a more positive experience, even for those who don’t get the job.

2. Respect Candidates’ Time and Energy

From the first touchpoint, ensure that candidates are given a fair assessment without unnecessary delays. If the hiring process stretches beyond a reasonable timeline, offer feedback to candidates along the way.

Respecting candidates’ time by reducing wait periods and unnecessary tasks will not only lead to a better candidate experience but also improve your chances of landing top talent.

3. Foster a Candidate-Centric Culture

Train your hiring teams to prioritize the candidate experience. Encourage empathy, active listening, and transparency throughout the recruitment process, ensuring that candidates feel valued from the moment they apply.

A positive candidate experience isn’t just good for prospective hires—it strengthens your employer brand and helps attract future talent. Candidates who feel respected are more likely to become advocates for your company, even if they don’t get the job.

The Human Cost Of Vampire Recruitment

It’s not just time that vampire recruitment drains—it’s also the emotional and mental well-being of job seekers. Job searching is already a stressful endeavor, and when candidates are subjected to confusing, exhausting, or downright exploitative processes, it can lead to burnout, anxiety, and even loss of confidence. 

People can vote with their feet and they will. They'll gravitate toward companies with reasonable hiring practices, partially out of a sense of self respect, but also because efficiency and clarity favors them meeting their needs. 

If you're not making it a better experience for candidates, you're only hurting yourself. They'll move on and find work somewhere else. It's only an employer's market if you do the right things to be an employer people actually want to join.

A CNN Jobs Report highlights the challenges many job seekers face in a competitive market. When recruiting processes add unnecessary stress, they only exacerbate these challenges. HR leaders must remember that candidates are people, not just resumes, and every interaction in the hiring process leaves a lasting impression.

What's Next?

Want to keep up with all the latest in recruiting and talent acquisition? Subscribe to the People Managing People newsletter. You'll get all the latest insights, expert tips and trends straight to your inbox.

David Rice

David Rice is a long time journalist and editor who specializes in covering human resources and leadership topics. His career has seen him focus on a variety of industries for both print and digital publications in the United States and UK.