Pinpoint vs. Greenhouse: Sammenligning & ekspertanmeldelser for 2026
Du jonglerer med ledige stillinger, beskeder fra ansættende ledere og en kandidatpipeline, der hele tiden bevæger sig hurtigere, end din proces kan følge med til.
På et tidspunkt holder regnearkene op med at fungere, kandidater falder mellem sprækkerne, og „hurtige opfølgninger“ bliver til konstante opfølgninger bare for at holde samtalerne på sporet. Det er som regel på det tidspunkt, du begynder at indsnævre valget af et reelt ansøgerstyringssystem, og to navne bliver ved med at dukke op: Pinpoint og Greenhouse.
Denne guide gennemgår, hvordan de sammenlignes, hvad hver platform er bedst til, og hvilken der passer til din ansættelsesarbejdsgang, så du kan træffe et sikkert valg og komme videre.
Pinpoint vs. Greenhouse: An Overview
Pinpoint
Visit PinpointOpens new windowGreenhouse
Read Greenhouse ReviewOpens new windowWhy Trust Our Software Recommendations
Our team has been testing and reviewing software since 2012. As HR experts ourselves, we know how difficult—and important—it is to choose the right software.
For this guide, we evaluated tools using hands-on testing and independent research, scoring tools using our selection criteria. We also draw on insights from industry thought leaders and practicing HR experts.
Our reviews reflect our human editorial judgment, not a sales pitch.
Expert reviewers:
Pinpoint vs. Greenhouse Pricing Comparison
| Pinpoint | Greenhouse | |
|---|---|---|
| Free Trial | Free demo available | Free demo available |
| Pricing | Pricing upon request | Pricing upon request |
Priser og skjulte omkostninger ved Pinpoint vs. Greenhouse
Pinpoint bruger tilbudsbaserede priser, så du skal anmode om en demo eller ringe og fortælle lidt om din virksomhed og ansættelsesproces for at få en skræddersyet pris.
Greenhouse er mere åben med en trindelt model, der tilbyder tre abonnementer: Essential, Advanced og Expert, hvor prisen typisk skalerer efter virksomhedens størrelse frem for en fast offentlig pris.
Hvis du gerne vil se tydelige abonnementsniveauer med det samme, er Greenhouse det letteste sted at starte. Hvis du foretrækker priser baseret på, hvordan dit team faktisk ansætter, passer Pinpoint bedre.
Pinpoint vs. Greenhouse Feature Comparison
| Pinpoint | Greenhouse | |
|---|---|---|
| API | ||
| Application Tracking | ||
| Behavioral Testing | ||
| Budgeting | ||
| Calendar Management | ||
| Candidate Database | ||
| Cognitive Testing | ||
| Contact Management | ||
| Custom Assessments | ||
| Dashboard | ||
| Dashboards | ||
| Data Export | ||
| Data Import | ||
| Data Visualization | ||
| Email Integration | ||
| Employee Database | ||
| Employee Onboarding | ||
| External Integrations | ||
| Feedback Management | ||
| Forecasting | ||
| Interview Scheduling | ||
| Multi-Source Feedback | ||
| Multi-User | ||
| Notifications | ||
| Personality Testing | ||
| Psychometric Testing | ||
| Scheduling | ||
| Status Notifications | ||
| Travel Management |
Integrationer mellem Pinpoint og Greenhouse
| Integration | Pinpoint | Greenhouse |
| ✅ | ✅ | |
| Slack | ✅ | ✅ |
| Zoom | ✅ | ✅ |
| Microsoft Teams | ✅ | ✅ |
| Google Workspace | ✅ | ✅ |
| Salesforce | ✅ | ✅ |
| Workday | ✅ | ✅ |
| BambooHR | ✅ | ✅ |
| DocuSign | ✅ | ✅ |
| Mailchimp | ✅ | ✅ |
| API | ✅ | ✅ |
| Zapier | ✅ | ✅ |
Pinpoint og Greenhouse understøtter begge integrationer med almindelige værktøjer som LinkedIn, Slack, Zoom, Microsoft Teams og Google Workspace samt HR- og forretningsplatforme som Salesforce, Workday og BambooHR.
De integreres også med DocuSign og Mailchimp og inkluderer understøttelse af API og Zapier, så du kan forbinde andre apps og arbejdsgange.
Pinpoint vs. Greenhouse: sikkerhed, compliance & pålidelighed
| Faktor | Pinpoint | Greenhouse |
| Databeskyttelse | Pinpoint følger GDPR-tilpassede databeskyttelsespraksisser og har ISO 27001- og SOC 2 Type II-certificeringer, der hjælper med at holde data sikre. | Greenhouse understøtter databeskyttelse gennem årlige SOC 2 Type 2-revisioner og ISO 27001/27701-certificeringer. |
| Kryptering | Pinpoint beskytter data under overførsel via TLS 1.2/1.3 og krypterer lagrede data med LUKS og AES-256. | Greenhouse krypterer kundedata under overførsel ved hjælp af TLS 1.2+ og ved lagring med 256-bit AES-kryptering. |
| Overholdelse af lovgivning | Pinpoint er i overensstemmelse med større databeskyttelsesforordninger, herunder GDPR og CCPA. | Greenhouse understøtter overholdelse af GDPR og CCPA/CPRA med databeskyttelseskontroller. |
| Systemets oppetid | Pinpoint har en SLA med 99,5 % oppetid og rapporterer typisk en oppetid på over 99,99 %. | Greenhouse tilbyder en SLA med servicekreditter baseret på oppetid (varierer efter produkt). |
Pinpoint og Greenhouse fremhæver begge databeskyttelsespraksisser og sikkerhedsstandarder, der er designet til at beskytte kandidat- og kundedata.
Begge understøtter kryptering under overførsel og ved lagring, er i overensstemmelse med større databeskyttelsesforordninger som GDPR og CCPA/CPRA og tilbyder oppetidsgarantier understøttet af SLA'er med servicekreditter, hvis kravene ikke opfyldes.
Pinpoint følger også GDPR-tilpassede databeskyttelsespraksisser og har ISO 27001- og SOC 2 Type II-certificeringer, der understøtter en stærk databeskyttelse.
Pinpoint vs. Greenhouse: brugervenlighed
| Faktor | Pinpoint | Greenhouse |
| Brugerflade | Pinpoint har en enkel brugerflade, der hjælper dig med at opsætte roller, følge kandidater og administrere feedback uden forvirring. | Greenhouse tilbyder en omfattende brugerflade med tilpasningsbare arbejdsgange til forskellige faser af rekrutteringen. |
| Onboardingoplevelse | Pinpoint tilbyder guidet onboardinghjælp samt selvbetjeningsvejledninger, videoer og gennemgange. | Greenhouse tilbyder en dybdegående onboardingproces med omfattende dokumentation og træningssessioner. |
| Opsætningsproces | Pinpoint har en enkel opsætning, der kræver minimal konfiguration, så du hurtigt kan komme i gang. | Greenhouse kræver mere tid til opsætning på grund af de omfattende tilpasningsmuligheder. |
| Kundesupport | Pinpoint inkluderer tydelige kontaktmuligheder og et Hjælpecenter, der er nemt at finde rundt i. | Greenhouse tilbyder kundesupport døgnet rundt med dedikerede kundeansvarlige til større teams. |
Pinpoint og Greenhouse tilbyder begge en enkel brugerflade til administration af roller, kandidater og feedback på rekrutteringen samt onboardingunderstøttelse gennem vejledninger, træningsmaterialer og gennemgange.
Pinpoint vs Greenhouse: Pros & Cons
Pinpoint
- Flexible, AI-powered ATS that's easy to navigate for recruiters, hiring managers, and candidates, even when multiple hiring streams are running in parallel.
- AI is built into your hiring workflow to help your team screen faster, evaluate more consistently, and keep candidates engaged.
- Hands-on Customer Success support from day one, plus a comprehensive Help Center with guides, videos, and walkthroughs.
- Because of the platform's depth, you'll only get the most of it if you have a clear sense of how you want to hire.
- Payroll, benefits, or performance management requires a separate HRIS since Pinpoint is a focused ATS.
- Pricing isn't listed publicly, so you'll need to request a quote to get a number for your specific situation.
Greenhouse
- You’ll appreciate Greenhouse's user-friendly interface that simplifies the hiring process.
- Its robust reporting tools help your team make data-driven hiring decisions.
- Greenhouse's effective collaboration features enhance teamwork across departments.
- You might find the initial setup to be a bit complex for new users.
- Some users report that customization options can be limited.
- The software may require a learning curve for those unfamiliar with advanced recruitment tools.
Best Use Cases for Pinpoint and Greenhouse
Pinpoint
- Mid-Size and Enterprise Teams You're past the point of managing hiring in spreadsheets and email, and you need a platform that can keep pace with a growing, structured talent acquisition function and scaling team.
- Contingent and Contract Hiring You hire contractors or contingent workers and need workflows that support different compliance and classification needs.
- Dedicated In-House TA Teams You have a proper talent acquisition function in place and need a platform that supports the whole team, from recruiters and hiring managers through to HR leads and department heads, across every open role at once.
- Hiring Across Multiple Brands You manage multiple employer brands and want separate career experiences while keeping hiring connected under one system.
- Global Hiring You recruit across countries or time zones and need consistent coordination with room for regional flexibility.
- High Volume Hiring You need to process lots of applicants quickly using workflows, filtering, and automation to keep the pipeline moving
Greenhouse
- Tech Startups Greenhouse supports rapid team scaling with its efficient and user-friendly hiring tools.
- Finance Industry Its data-driven reporting helps you make informed hiring decisions in a fast-paced environment.
- Large Corporations Greenhouse simplifies complex workflows, making it easier for big HR teams to manage recruitment.
- Remote Teams The software’s collaboration features enhance team coordination across different locations.
- Human Resources Departments Greenhouse’s intuitive interface supports seamless coordination and communication within your team.
- Creative Agencies Its effective collaboration tools are perfect for agencies needing to hire across various creative roles.
Hvem bør bruge Pinpoint, og hvem bør bruge Greenhouse?
Efter min mening er Pinpoint fantastisk til teams, der håndterer forskellige rekrutteringsbehov på samme tid, f.eks. rekruttering på tværs af flere afdelinger, lokationer eller rolletype, fordi deres "Plan"-pakke og funktioner til administration af stillingsanmodninger hjælper med at holde godkendelser og rekrutteringsplaner organiserede, samtidig med at hvert team kan bruge den arbejdsgang, der passer bedst til dem.
Hvis du derimod har en mere standardiseret og procesorienteret rekrutteringsopsætning, hvor hvert team skal følge den samme drejebog, vil Greenhouse være bedre egnet til dig på grund af deres fokus på skalerbare arbejdsgange og AI-drevne værktøjer, som hjælper med at holde rekrutteringen struktureret, ensartet og lettere at administrere i stor skala.
Differences Between Pinpoint and Greenhouse
| Pinpoint | Greenhouse | |
|---|---|---|
| AI-Powered Automation | Pinpoint pairs workflow automation with tools like AI Candidate Companion for candidate support and AI Candidate Filters for faster shortlisting. | Greenhouse puts heavier emphasis on AI-driven recruiting capabilities as part of improving hiring efficiency and decision-making at scale. |
| Customer Feedback | Pinpoint includes candidate experience surveys, so you can collect feedback directly and spot where candidates are dropping off. | Greenhouse emphasizes candidate experience consistency, but Pinpoint is more direct about collecting feedback inside the platform. |
| Flexibility vs. Structure | Pinpoint works well when teams need different workflows by role, department, or location without forcing one rigid structure. | Greenhouse is stronger when you want everyone hiring through one consistent, structured process across the org. |
| Recruitment Planning | Pinpoint includes Job Requisition Management, which helps you manage job requests, approvals, and hiring plans before roles go live. | Greenhouse is less requisition-planning focused and more centered on executing the hiring workflow once roles are open. |
| Sourcing & Attraction | Pinpoint leans harder into attraction tools like a careers site, job board advertising, employee referrals, and a sourcing extension to help you build pipeline faster. | Greenhouse focuses more on scalable sourcing operations and supporting a structured recruiting engine across teams. |
| Visit PinpointOpens new window | Read Greenhouse ReviewOpens new window |
Similarities Between Pinpoint and Greenhouse
| Applicant Tracking (ATS) | Both provide core ATS tools like pipelines, candidate profiles, job posting, and end-to-end candidate tracking. |
|---|---|
| Collaboration | Both help recruiters and hiring managers collaborate in one place through shared candidate profiles, notes, and hiring activity. |
| Integrations | Both support integrations to connect with recruiting and HR tools across your hiring stack. |
| Interview Assistance | Both support interview scheduling and structured evaluations to help teams make consistent hiring decisions. |
| Reporting | Both provide reporting tools to track hiring progress and performance. |
| Visit PinpointOpens new window Read Greenhouse ReviewOpens new window | |
