10 Effective Performance Rating Scales [With Examples]
: Performance rating scales are crucial in performance management, offering organizations a structured approach to assess employee contributions and align them with business objectives.
: These scales promote fairness, consistency, and actionable insights while fostering employee growth and accountability.
: Organizations can choose from a variety of scales, including numerical, behaviorally anchored, and competency-based models, tailoring their approach to meet specific team and organizational needs.
Performance rating scales are essential tools in performance management, providing organizations with a structured way to assess employee contributions and align them with business goals.
They help ensure fairness, consistency, and actionable insights while fostering growth and accountability.
On the flipside, they can negatively impact evaluations for everyone and lead managers to focus on the wrong things.
Here I'll delve into some common scales with plenty of examples and provide some best practices for helping you choose the right scale for your needs.
What Is A Performance Rating Scale?
A performance rating scale is a tool used in performance management to evaluate and measure an employee's job performance against specific criteria or objectives.
It provides a structured way to assess competencies, behaviors, and achievements, enabling consistency and fairness in evaluations.
Performance rating scales are typically used in formalized performance management processes like performance reviews or 360-degree feedback, but can be used in casual performance evaluations, peer evaluations, stakeholder feedback, customer reviews and more!
Potential benefits of using a performance rating scale include:
- Clarity and alignment: Employees understand exactly what’s expected of them and how their performance will be measured.
- Easy comparison: Allows for straightforward comparison of performance across different employees and departments, making it easier to identify top performers.
- Data-driven decisions: Provides quantitative data to support informed decisions regarding promotions, raises, and development opportunities.
- Transparency and accountability: A well-designed rating scale promotes transparency in the performance evaluation process, increasing accountability for both managers and employees.
Types Of Performance Review Rating Scales
Performance rating scales aren’t one-size-fits-all. The right scale can make all the difference in ensuring your performance evaluations are fair, clear, and meaningful—for both employees and managers.
Whether you’re looking for something straightforward and data-driven, or a more nuanced approach that captures specific behaviors, there’s a scale that can fit your needs.
Below I’ve outlined 10 of the most common types of performance rating scales (in no particular order). Each one comes with examples, when to use them, and the pros and cons to help you choose the best fit for your team.
1. Numerical rating scale
What it is: Employees are rated on a numerical scale, typically from 1 to 5 or 1 to 10, to indicate their performance level. This scale is very commonly found in performance evaluations!
Example (from Lattice CEO Jack Altman):
- 1 - Below expectations
- 2 - Meets expectations
- 3 - Exceeds expectations
- 4 - Greatly exceeds expectations
- 5 - Truly outstanding
Use cases: When you need a simple, quantifiable way to evaluate employee performance, track progress, and compare results across teams or individuals. The numerical scale is ideal for performance metrics that can be measured objectively or when you need data for reporting and decision-making.
Pros: Easy to understand, implement, and aggregate for comparisons.
Cons: May lack nuance and can be subjective without clear definitions.
2. Descriptive rating scale
What it is: Uses descriptive terms (e.g., "Needs Improvement," "Exceeds Expectations") instead of numbers.
Example: A customer service representative evaluated on “Problem-solving” with ratings like "Needs Improvement," "Meets Expectations," or "Exceeds Expectations."
Use cases: The descriptive scale is useful when you need a qualitative evaluation of performance that emphasizes clear, contextual feedback rather than numerical scores.
It works best in scenarios where understanding the "why" behind performance is critical, and subjective assessment is acceptable.
Pros: Provides clarity and context, reducing subjectivity.
Cons: Harder to aggregate for data-driven decision-making.
3. Behaviorally anchored rating scale (BARS)
What it is: Combines numerical ratings with detailed behavioral descriptions for each level, clarifying what each score represents. This is another very commonly-used scale!
Example: A customer service agent rated on "Handling Complaints":
- 1 - Poor: Frequently transfers calls or escalates complaints without resolution.
- 3 - Meets Expectations: Resolves most complaints independently but occasionally requires help.
- 5 - Outstanding: Resolves complaints quickly, with minimal supervision, and receives positive customer feedback regularly.
Use cases: When you need an objective, detailed, and behavior-focused evaluation method that reduces subjectivity. BARS links performance ratings to specific, observable behaviors, making it particularly useful for roles with clearly defined tasks or customer-facing responsibilities.
Pros: Reduces subjectivity by anchoring ratings in observable behaviors.
Cons: Time-consuming to develop and implement.
4. Graphic rating scale
What It Is: A visual scale (e.g., line, slider, or graph) where raters indicate performance levels along a continuum.
Example: A marketing coordinator rated on "Creativity" with a slider from 1 (Low Creativity) to 5 (Highly Creative).
Use cases: You would use a graphic rating scale when you need a simple, visual, and easy-to-use evaluation method that allows managers to quickly assess employee performance along a defined range.
This scale is ideal for measuring performance factors such as productivity, communication skills, and teamwork, especially when tracking trends or comparing employees.
Pros: Simple and visually intuitive.
Cons: Lacks depth and can be vague without anchors.
5. Forced distribution scale
What it is: Requires a set percentage of employees to fall into predefined performance categories (e.g., a bell curve).
Example: A sales team rated by revenue generated, with the top 20% classified as "Exceeds Expectations" and the lowest 10% as "Needs Improvement."
Use cases: You would use a forced distribution scale when you need to rank employees across a performance curve, ensuring differentiation and identifying top and bottom performers.
This method forces evaluators to fit employees into predetermined performance categories, making it useful for environments focused on competitive performance and reward-based decisions.
Pros: Encourages differentiation and prevents grade inflation.
Cons: Can demotivate employees if perceived as unfair, especially in smaller teams.
6. Checklist scale
What it is: A list of performance indicators that evaluators mark as present or absent.
Example:
- "Consistently meets deadlines" – Yes/No
- "Demonstrates leadership" – Yes/No
Use cases: You would use a checklist scale when you need a straightforward, binary evaluation system that tracks whether employees meet specific job-related tasks, skills, or behaviors. This scale is ideal for assessing clear, measurable tasks and ensuring compliance with set standards or operational requirements.
Pros: Easy to administer and ensures specific behaviors are evaluated.
Cons: May oversimplify performance and lack qualitative feedback.
7. Likert scale
What it is: Uses a range of agreement or satisfaction levels (e.g., "Strongly Disagree" to "Strongly Agree") to assess performance.
Example: "My manager communicates expectations clearly."
- 1 = Never | 2 = Rarely | 3 = Sometimes | 4 = Often | 5 = Always
Use cases: This scale is ideal for evaluating subjective aspects of employee performance, such as engagement, communication, leadership, or job satisfaction.
It allows respondents to express degrees of agreement, frequency, or effectiveness, providing more nuanced data than binary responses.
Pros: Captures degrees of performance or behavior in more detail than binary scales.
Cons: Subjective and may require explanation to align understanding.
Note: Does this seem like the numerical scale we already talked about? Unlike numerical scales, which assign direct performance scores, Likert scales measure levels of agreement or perception, making them ideal for assessing subjective factors like engagement or satisfaction.
8. Competency-based scale
What it is: Evaluates employees based on role-specific competencies, such as problem-solving, leadership, or communication.
Example: A software developer rated on "Coding Proficiency":
- 1 = Basic understanding of coding principles
- 3 = Writes functional, well-structured code
- 5 = Develops advanced, scalable software solutions
Use cases: You would use a competency-based scale when evaluating employees on job-specific skills, knowledge, and behaviors critical to their roles, for example how well someone demonstrates competencies like leadership, problem-solving, communication, or technical expertise.
It works best in roles where skills can be clearly defined and measured against performance standards.
Pros: Directly links performance to job requirements.
Cons: Can be complex to define and implement consistently.
9. Ranking scale
What it is: Employees are ranked relative to one another, from best to worst performer.
Example: Consultants at a professional services firm ranked by "Client Retention Rates" and "Billable Hours."
Use cases: You would use a ranking scale when you need to compare employees directly by ranking them from best to worst based on their overall performance, contributions, or specific job-related criteria.
This method is ideal when organizations must identify top performers for promotions, rewards, or layoffs, especially in competitive environments or when distributing limited incentives.
Pros: Highlights top talent and identifies gaps in performance.
Cons: Can create competition or resentment among employees.
10. Custom/hybrid scales
What it is: Combines features of different scales (e.g., numerical with descriptive or BARS) to fit unique organizational needs.
Example: A project manager evaluated on "Budget Management" (Numerical: 1-5) and "Team Leadership" (Descriptive: Exceeds Expectations/Meets Expectations).
Use cases: You would use a custom/hybrid scale when your organization needs a flexible evaluation system that combines features from multiple rating scales to match specific performance management goals. This scale is ideal for businesses with diverse roles, complex job functions, or unique evaluation criteria that cannot be captured by a single type of scale.
Pros: Highly flexible and tailored to specific goals.
Cons: Can be time-intensive to design and maintain.
Numerical Rating Scale Example
General Motors (GM) has implemented a 5-point performance rating system with the following categories:
| Rating | Description |
| 5 | Significantly Exceeds Expectations Performance far surpasses standards. |
| 4 | Exceeds Expectations Often exceeds performance requirements. |
| 3 | Achieves Expectations Meets job expectations consistently. |
| 2 | Partially Meets Expectations Occasionally does not meet standards. |
| 1 | Does Not Meet Expectations Performance falls significantly short. |
According to sources within GM, employees are evaluated on the updated rankings during their year-end performance review.
In their system of performance-based compensation, the company estimates about 70% of the organization will land in the "achieves" middle category, receiving 100% of their target bonuses.
Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale Example
Here's an example of a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS) used in a customer service role:
| Rating Level | Behavioral Description |
| 1 | Frequently fails to address customer inquiries, often providing incorrect or incomplete information. |
| 3 | Addresses customer inquiries adequately, providing correct information but lacks proactive engagement. |
| 5 | Consistently anticipates customer needs, provides comprehensive information, and follows up to ensure satisfaction. |
This BARS framework offers specific behavioral examples for each performance level, facilitating objective and clear evaluations. By focusing on observable behaviors, it helps reduce subjectivity in performance appraisals.
Descriptive Rating Scale Example
Hilton Hotels uses a descriptive rating scale to evaluate the performance of front desk staff based on customer service delivery.
Performance Category: Guest Interaction
- Outstanding: Consistently goes above and beyond to ensure guest satisfaction, anticipates needs, and receives frequent positive feedback.
- Exceeds Expectations: Regularly provides exceptional service, often exceeding guest expectations with proactive assistance.
- Meets Expectations: Provides friendly and efficient service, meeting standard requirements for guest interaction.
- Needs Improvement: Occasionally misses opportunities to assist guests effectively, resulting in neutral or negative feedback.
- Unsatisfactory: Frequently fails to meet guest expectations, with recurring complaints about service quality.
This type of scale provides clarity and context, allowing Hilton to evaluate their staff's performance with qualitative depth and actionable feedback.
Competency Rating Scale Example
Deloitte uses a competency rating scale to evaluate employees on competencies like leadership, problem-solving, and collaboration.
For instance:
Competency: Leadership
- 1 - Basic: Reluctant to take initiative or lead projects, requiring frequent guidance.
- 3 - Proficient: Successfully leads small projects, motivates team members, and manages resources effectively.
- 5 - Expert: Consistently leads large, complex projects, inspires innovation, and mentors others in leadership skills.
This scale ensures employees are assessed on critical competencies specific to their roles, helping Deloitte identify leaders and align talent development with organizational needs..
Checklist Scale Example
A practical example of a checklist scale could be seen at Amazon in their warehouse operations, where employee performance is assessed against a list of predefined tasks and behaviors.
Example checklist for warehouse associate:
- Consistently meets daily productivity targets (e.g., number of packages processed).
- Adheres to safety protocols and wears required protective gear.
- Demonstrates punctuality and reliability in attendance.
- Completes quality checks with a 98% accuracy rate.
- Assists team members during high-demand periods.
Each task is marked as "Yes" (completed) or "No" (not completed), providing a straightforward and objective evaluation of performance. This scale ensures clarity in expectations and highlights specific areas for improvement.
How To Choose The Right Performance Rating Scale
Choosing the right performance rating scale isn’t just about picking a tool that works on paper—it’s about creating a system that fits your organization’s culture, values, and the way people actually work.
The best scales are tailored to your team’s needs, reflect what your organization values most, and make the process fair and meaningful for everyone involved. Here’s how to make the right choice, with examples along the way.
1. Start with your goals
First, get clear on what you’re trying to achieve with the scale. Is it about tracking performance trends, identifying training needs, or making decisions about promotions and raises? Are you focusing on outcomes, behaviors, or both?
Example: A sales team might benefit from a numerical scale that focuses on results like revenue generated, while a customer service team might need a BARS scale that evaluates behaviors like problem-solving and empathy.
Quick Tip: If your goal includes developing employees, choose a scale that highlights strengths and areas for growth, not just a summary judgment.
2. Reflect on your organization’s values
Your assessment and scales should measure what truly matters to your organization—not just what looks good in theory. If collaboration, innovation, or customer satisfaction are priorities, make sure those elements show up in the scale.
Example: At a company that values teamwork, a descriptive scale might include ratings like “Consistently builds strong partnerships with colleagues.” In a fast-paced tech startup focused on innovation, a competency-based scale could measure behaviors like “Proactively identifies opportunities for product improvement.”
Cultural Fit: Think about national culture, too. For example, in a collectivist culture like Japan, it might be important to include team-based measures, while an individualist culture like the U.S. might lean more on individual contributions.
3. Decide on simplicity or detail
How detailed should the scale be? That depends on the purpose and resources available.
Simple scales: A numerical or descriptive scale is great when you need a quick, high-level assessment, like ranking performance across a large group.
Detailed scales: Behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) or competency-based scales work better when you want in-depth insights tied to specific, observable actions.
Example: If you're evaluating leadership potential, a detailed scale might rate behaviors like "Encourages team innovation by seeking and implementing ideas" with specific examples for each rating level.
4. Match the scale to the job
Different roles require different evaluation approaches. A one-size-fits-all performance rating scale might seem convenient, but it rarely does justice to the diversity of job responsibilities and contributions within an organization.
To ensure accuracy and fairness, the scale you choose should align with the specific tasks, skills, and expectations of each role.
For highly measurable or output-driven roles, a numerical rating scale is often the best fit. This type of scale works well when performance can be quantified and compared easily:
Example for a sales team: A 1–5 numerical scale could measure metrics like revenue generation or the percentage of targets met. A rating of “1” might signify performance below 50% of quota, while a “5” could represent exceeding 150% of quota.
Example in manufacturing: A numerical scale could assess productivity by units produced or errors per shift, offering a straightforward way to track and compare results across employees.
For roles where creativity or innovation are key, more descriptive or behaviorally anchored scales may be better suited.
Example for graphic designer: A graphic designer might be evaluated using a graphic rating scale, with anchors such as “Minimal Creativity” at one end and “Highly Creative and Original” at the other.
This allows for a nuanced look at how well the designer meets expectations in areas like ideation or visual execution.
For technical or specialized positions, scales that measure competencies provide a clearer picture of performance:
Example for IT engineer: Assess using a competency-based scale, with criteria such as “Coding Proficiency” or “Troubleshooting Skills.” A rating of “1” could indicate the ability to write basic code, while a “5” reflects expertise in developing scalable, efficient software.
Note about team dynamics
For roles requiring collaboration, it’s important to measure behaviors that reflect influence and teamwork. In these cases, the scale could include criteria like “Effectiveness in cross-functional collaboration” or “Contribution to team decision-making.” This ensures that contributions beyond individual outputs are recognized.
PM example: A project manager in a matrixed team structure might be rated on their ability to align stakeholders and facilitate team outcomes, using descriptions or ratings tied to collaboration.
Tailoring the scale to each role (often done by team or department) helps to create an evaluation process that not only captures individual performance accurately but also reflects the unique ways each person contributes to the organization’s success.
Remember, this is not a one-size-fits all approach! If you want to get the most out of your performance evaluations and ratings scales, they need to be fit to the context and role.
5. Train managers
The best scale won’t succeed if managers don’t know how to use it consistently and fairly. Training ensures they understand the scale, avoid biases, and provide meaningful feedback.
Key training focus areas
- Understanding the Scale: Teach managers what each rating means with clear examples.
- Example: For teamwork, “Meets Expectations” could mean fulfilling assigned responsibilities, while “Exceeds Expectations” means actively supporting colleagues and driving collaboration.
- Avoiding Bias: Help managers recognize and mitigate common pitfalls like:
- Halo Effect: Letting one strong trait influence the entire rating.
- Leniency Bias: Overrating to avoid tough conversations.
- Providing Feedback: Train managers to pair ratings with specific, actionable feedback. Ratings should explain “why” and support growth.
6. Pilot, test and adjust
Before rolling out your scale to the entire organization, test it with a smaller group. This allows you to identify any pain points and refine the system before it’s widely implemented.
If you’ve read any of my other articles on process, you’ll know I’ll always recommend a pilot–same goes for this! Here’s how to do it:
- Select a Test Group: Choose a mix of employees and managers from different roles and departments to ensure the scale works across various contexts.
- Example: Test a numerical scale with sales teams focused on quotas and a competency-based scale with IT teams to measure skills like problem-solving and coding proficiency.
- Train Participants: Teach managers how to use the scale, providing clear definitions and examples for each rating.
- Example: For a graphic designer, explain what “Highly Creative” means with examples like “Introduced original concepts that increased client satisfaction.”
- Run the Pilot: Use the scale for a set period, like one performance cycle, and gather feedback afterward.
- Example: If using a checklist scale, assess whether marking “Yes” or “No” for tasks like “Consistently meets deadlines” feels fair and actionable.
- Gather Feedback: Ask managers and employees what worked and what didn’t. Were the criteria clear? Did the ratings feel accurate?
- Example: Managers might report that a competency like “Leadership” needs more specific descriptions, such as “Guides team to complete projects on time.”
- Refine and Adjust: Use the feedback to tweak the scale. Clarify unclear criteria, simplify overly complex sections, or adjust rating levels as needed.
- Example: Change a 7-point scale to 5 points if participants found it hard to distinguish between ratings like “5” and “6.”
The reason we do pilots so often, especially when working with processes that impact people and their perceptions of themselves and their performance, is because it gives us a chance to address issues early and build confidence in the process before releasing it to a larger group (which can be very chaotic if a big issue was not resolved in a pilot).
If you want confidence that your scale will feel fair, clear, and relevant to your organization, you need to run a pilot.
Best Practices For Ensuring Your Performance Rating Scales Drive Performance
Performance rating scale creation and implementation can be tricky, but it doesn’t have to be!
When you are working to up-level your performance process with new scales, consider these best practices to help ensure your performance rating scales not only measure performance but also drive meaningful conversations, align employees with organizational goals, and promote fairness.
Align ratings with clear objectives
Your rating scale should reflect organizational goals, team priorities, and individual responsibilities. Clear alignment ensures that employees understand how their contributions impact the organization.
How to do it: Define success for each role based on specific outcomes and behaviors. For example, a customer support team might tie ratings to metrics like resolution time and customer satisfaction scores, while a marketing team might focus on campaign performance and creativity.
Example: If innovation is a key organizational objective, include criteria like “Proactively identifies and implements process improvements” in your scale.
Provide training for managers
Managers are the key to ensuring your rating scale is applied consistently and fairly. Without training, even the best-designed scale can result in bias and inconsistency.
Focus areas: Train managers on avoiding common biases (like leniency bias or recency bias), applying the scale consistently, and delivering constructive feedback. I like to include role-playing exercises to practice real-world scenarios.
Example: During training, a manager learns to explain why an employee was rated “Meets Expectations” for teamwork, using clear examples of their collaboration efforts and areas to improve. Repeat until people get it right and there’s alignment across different managers from various teams—it can be fun when led well!
Make feedback continuous
Don’t limit the use of the rating scale to annual or semi-annual reviews. Integrating it into ongoing feedback processes helps employees course-correct and improve throughout the year.
You can even encourage managers to use the ratings scales and run more frequent evaluations within their teams, outside of the formal process led by HR.
How to Do It: Encourage managers to use elements of the scale during one-on-one check-ins, project debriefs, and quarterly reviews.
Example: A manager might use the scale to discuss how an employee’s leadership during a recent project “Exceeds Expectations,” providing examples of how they guided the team to deliver results ahead of schedule.
Encourage self-assessment
Self-assessments allow employees to reflect on their own performance before formal evaluations. This fosters alignment, transparency, and more productive review discussions.
How to Do It: Use the same rating scale for self-assessments to make comparisons easier and promote open dialogue—just ask employees to rate themselves.
Example: An employee rates themselves “Meets Expectations” on time management, but their manager rates them “Exceeds Expectations.” This opens a conversation about how the employee’s consistent early delivery has positively impacted the team.
Link ratings to development plans
Use performance ratings as a foundation for employee development. High performers can be given stretch assignments, while areas for improvement can inform personalized training plans.
How to do it: Pair each rating level with potential development opportunities. For instance, employees rated “Exceeds Expectations” might be assigned leadership projects, while “Needs Improvement” could trigger coaching or mentoring. The best managers may already have this in place informally, so look to them for guidance.
Example: A project manager rated “Exceeds Expectations” for budget management is offered the chance to lead a high-visibility initiative, preparing them for a future leadership role.
Regularly review and update the scale
Organizations evolve, and your performance rating scale should too. Regularly review the scale to ensure it remains relevant as priorities, goals, and roles change.
How to Do It: Solicit feedback from team members and managers about what’s working and what needs improvement. Update the scale as needed to better reflect current organizational goals.
Example: After a merger, an organization updates its competency-based scale to include “Adaptability to change” as a critical metric for all roles.
You can also solicit feedback from managers and employees for improvements.
Calibration processes
Calibration sessions align managers on how to apply the scale consistently across teams, reducing bias and discrepancies.
How to do it: Managers review and discuss sample ratings together, sharing how they would rate specific performance scenarios. These discussions help define what each rating level looks like in practice and ensures ratings are applied consistently.
Example: In a session, managers agree that “Exceeds Expectations” for leadership includes mentoring others and driving team innovation, while “Meets Expectations” means effectively managing day-to-day responsibilities.
Legal and compliance considerations
Your rating scale should comply with all legal and regulatory requirements, avoiding indirect discrimination and bias.
Ensure the scale does not indirectly discriminate based on race, gender, age, disability, religion, or other protected categories under laws such as the Equal Employment Opportunity Act (EEOA) (in the U.S.) or similar regulations in your region.
How to do it: Review your scale to ensure it doesn’t unintentionally disadvantage any group. Use inclusive language and consult with legal or HR experts when designing the scale.
Example: A scale for a customer service role avoids subjective language like “Fits the team culture” and instead evaluates measurable criteria like “Consistently achieves a customer satisfaction rating of 90% or higher.”
Subscribe To The People Managing People Newsletter
To remain up to date on all the latest in performance management, subscribe to our weekly newsletter for HR and business leaders. You'll receive all our latest content to help you grow in your career and make greater impact in your org.
