Skip to main content
Key Takeaways

Engagement Problem: AI adoption struggles due to lack of engagement and unclear interaction practices at organizations.

AI Playbook Necessity: Organizations progressing with AI use playbooks tailored for effective interaction and behavior change.

Interaction Mastery: True AI skill lies in interaction mastery, beyond simple prompt engineering for effective collaboration.

Prompt Training Limitations: Prompt workshops raise awareness but fail to integrate AI usage into employees' daily workflows.

Leadership Influence: AI adoption improves when leadership visibly engages and sets a tone for safe, exploratory use.

The issue with AI is that it’s not like traditional tech…

Organisations everywhere are investing heavily in AI. They’re buying licences, rolling out copilots and launching AI policies. They are running prompting workshops, creating governance groups and publishing fancy communications. And yet, many leaders are quietly asking the same question.

“Why aren’t our people actually using it?”

Keep Reading—and Keep Leading Smarter

Create a free account to finish this piece and join a community of forward-thinking leaders unlocking tools, playbooks, and insights for thriving in the age of AI.

Step 1 of 3

Name*
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Let me tell you why… Because AI adoption is an engagement problem.

Many organisations are still approaching AI enablement as though it’s another software rollout. They are training people on the features, giving them a few use cases, sharing some prompts and hoping adoption follows. 

But AI is different.

This is not just software people click through. AI changes how people think, create, communicate, analyse, problem-solve and make decisions. It asks people to interact with intelligence itself, often without enough confidence, context or clarity around what “good” looks like. It feels more like actual intelligence than historical tech or software.

And that’s where many AI rollouts begin to stall. Employees feel overwhelmed by the pace of change. Managers don’t know how to lead AI adoption inside their teams. Prompt training creates short-term excitement, but inconsistent long-term habits and leaders expect innovation while unintentionally creating fear around experimentation and failure.

All this means that AI gets positioned as transformational technology but becomes another underused workplace tool.

How to Build an AI Playbook Your People Will Actually Use

The organisations making real progress with AI are doing something differently. They’re not just teaching people how to use AI tools. They’re teaching people how to interact with AI effectively as thought partners and coaches and operationalising those interactions into repeatable behaviours across the organisation.

That’s where an AI playbook becomes essential. Not a static document full of policies and approved prompts. It must be a practical framework that helps people understand how to think with AI, collaborate with AI and apply AI meaningfully in the flow of work.

Why AI Adoption Is Stalling

One of the biggest misconceptions in AI enablement is assuming that access equals adoption. But very little time is spent helping people build confidence in the interaction layer and that matters because AI usage is deeply behavioural. Our people need to know:

  • How to ask better questions
  • How to provide meaningful context
  • How to refine outputs
  • How to challenge responses
  • When to trust AI and when not to trust AI
  • How to apply human judgement alongside AI-generated outputs

AI Interaction Mastery Is the Real Skill

Many organisations talk about prompt engineering as though it’s the ultimate AI capability. Newsflash, It isn’t.

Prompting is just one small part of a much bigger skillset I refer to as AI interaction mastery.

The people getting the best results from AI are rarely the ones using clever one-line prompts copied from LinkedIn. They’re the people who understand how to collaborate with AI iteratively and intentionally. They know how to:

  • Shape context
  • Clarify outcomes
  • Guide tone
  • Refine thinking
  • Interrogate outputs
  • Apply expertise
  • Use AI as a thinking partner rather than an answer machine

This is where organisations need to shift their mindset. Instead of teaching employees to “use AI”, organisations should be teaching employees how to build high-quality AI interactions.

Here’s one of my simplest frameworks that I encourage organisations to adopt.

Persona + Context + Outcome

This dramatically improves the quality of AI interactions while helping employees think more intentionally about what they are trying to achieve. For example, instead of asking AI:

“Write me an email about our new AI rollout.”

Employees could structure the interaction like this:

  • Persona: Act as an experienced HR Director leading organisational change.
  • Context: We are introducing AI tools into a highly regulated financial services organisation where many employees are nervous about job impact and data privacy.
  • Outcome: Create a reassuring internal communication that builds psychological safety, encourages experimentation and explains how employees will be supported.

The difference in output quality is immediate. But more importantly, this framework changes how people think about interacting with AI as it encourages intentionality instead of automation.

And that distinction matters.

Because organisations don’t need employees blindly generating content faster. They need employees capable of thinking critically, collaborating intelligently and applying good judgement in AI enabled environments.

Join the People Managing People community for access to exclusive content, practical templates, member-only events, and weekly leadership insights—it’s free to join.

Join the People Managing People community for access to exclusive content, practical templates, member-only events, and weekly leadership insights—it’s free to join.

Name*

Why Prompt Training Alone Fails

Many organisations are now running AI prompting workshops. You know the ones? Employees attend, they get excited and they leave with pages of prompts. And then… very little changes.

Why?

Because prompting sessions often create awareness without embedding behaviour. People return to busy workloads and quickly fall back into old habits. The prompts they copied into documents don’t naturally integrate into their day-to-day work. The learning feels disconnected from real workflows.

This is why so many AI initiatives currently feel fragmented. There is enthusiasm, but not operationalisation. If organisations want meaningful adoption, they need to move beyond isolated training sessions and build systems that support repeatable AI interactions over time.

And they need to integrate tools.

If AI sits outside existing workflows, adoption will always struggle. The organisations seeing stronger engagement are embedding AI into meetings, communications, project work, coaching conversations, analysis, recruitment workflows and day-to-day decision-making.

What a Strong AI Playbook Actually Includes

An effective AI playbook is not a static PDF policy document that sits untouched in a shared folder. It is a practical, live and fluid operating guide for how your organisation interacts with AI.

It should help employees answer questions like:

  • What does good AI usage look like here?
  • How should I apply AI in my role?
  • What are the boundaries?
  • How do I improve output quality?
  • What human skills still matter most?
  • Where should I use judgement over automation?
  • How do I keep up to date with changes and innovations?

So let me let you into a secret…. the strongest AI playbooks usually include five key areas.

1. Ethical interaction principles

These are the behavioural foundations for AI usage across the organisation. For example:

  • Verify outputs before sharing externally
  • Add meaningful business context
  • Use AI to support thinking, not replace thinking
  • Protect confidential information
  • Iterate before judging output quality
  • Apply human judgement to sensitive decisions

These principles help create consistency while reducing risk and more importantly, they also reinforce that AI is a collaborative tool, not an autonomous replacement for human accountability.

2. Role-based prompt frameworks

Generic prompting examples rarely drive adoption because employees struggle to connect them to their own work. Go with role-specific examples which are far more effective. 

Managers, HR teams, recruiters, learning professionals, operations leaders and communications teams all interact with AI differently. For example, managers may use AI to:

  • Prepare for difficult conversations through roleplay with the AI
  • Structure feedback iteratively
  • Brainstorm team development ideas in context
  • Improve meeting communication for different team members or stakeholders

HR teams may use AI to:

  • Simplify policy explanations
  • Analyse workforce trends
  • Draft people communications
  • Support wellbeing initiatives which actually stick and are practical

Learning and Development teams may use AI to:

  • Create personalised learning pathways
  • Generate assessment questions, model answers and scoring mechanisms
  • Summarise workshops for key takeaways and nudges

As with all of this, the key is making AI usage feel relevant, practical and immediately applicable.

3. Organisational use cases

Many organisations focus too heavily on isolated productivity wins and do you know what? This is not your people’s focus! 

Sustainable AI adoption comes from identifying repeatable organisational workflows where AI genuinely improves outcomes and supports your people personally, as well as professionally. 

This could include:

  • Workforce planning
  • Leadership communication
  • Recruitment processes
  • Onboarding FAQs (as we know this is a time waster!)
  • Stakeholder reporting
  • Customer communication
  • Performance management
  • Strategic analysis

The best use cases are not always the flashiest ones. Often, the biggest impact comes from reducing friction in everyday work and sharing these outcomes as visible quick wins for everyone to employ and enjoy.

4. Human Oversight Expectations

As AI capability grows, we know that human judgement becomes more important, not less. Organisations need to be explicit about where human oversight is required and what responsibilities remain with employees and this is especially important in areas involving:

  • Ethics
  • Compliance
  • People decisions
  • Bias
  • Wellbeing
  • Organisational risk

This is where human distinctive skills become critical. The future workplace will increasingly reward these evolving skills (and if they are not on your development plan yet I strongly suggest you add them):

  • Critical thinking
  • Ethical intelligence
  • Learning agility
  • Clear communication with both human and ‘digital’ colleagues
  • Emotional intelligence

The organisations moving fastest with AI are becoming more intentional about where it matters most.

5. Leadership behaviours

AI adoption rises or falls based on leadership behaviour. Employees watch leaders closely during periods of change. If leaders appear detached, fearful or inconsistent around AI, teams notice it straight away. One of the biggest issues I see is leaders becoming engaged with AI without becoming activated.

They attend presentations, they read reports and they approve budgets. But they are not personally experimenting with AI themselves. And that creates a major credibility gap.

Leaders do not need to become technical experts. But they do need to visibly engage with AI in ways that build trust, confidence and therefore psychological safety across the organisation.

That means:

  • Sharing their own experimentation
  • Admitting what they are still learning
  • Demonstrating curiosity
  • Encouraging responsible exploration
  • Making space for teams to learn

People do not build confidence through pressure, they build confidence through permission, support and repetition.

My Practical Framework for Building an AI Playbook

Organisations often overcomplicate AI adoption and we have all been guilty of it. In reality, the most effective AI playbooks are practical, iterative and deeply connected to everyday work.

Here’s a simple five-step approach organisations can use.

Step 1: Identify high-friction workflows

Start by identifying where employees lose time, energy or motivation.

  • Where are repetitive tasks slowing people down?
  • Where are teams struggling with communication, analysis or information overload?
  • What do people get bored doing? And why?

AI adoption becomes more meaningful when it solves real people focused problems.

Step 2: Define what good AI usage looks like

Create clear behavioural standards for all to adhere to.

  • What does responsible, effective and high-quality AI interaction look like inside your organisation?
  • What is classed as red (do not do), amber (sometimes do depending on context) and green (always do within the safeguards)?

This is where interaction principles become essential.

Step 3: Build repeatable templates

Create practical scaffolding employees can use immediately. This could include:

  • Prompt frameworks (not prompt use cases!)
  • Meeting support templates
  • Analysis workflows
  • Role-based examples

The easier you make AI interactions, the faster adoption grows. Give people tools which are easy to apply and fun to use.

Step 4: Train managers first

Managers are one of the biggest multipliers in AI adoption and if managers lack confidence with AI, teams often stall.

But when managers actively experiment, encourage learning and model good practice, adoption accelerates significantly. We all know that managers shape culture more than policies ever will and you can supercharge your adoption with the right manager upskilling and support. 

Don’t get tempted with generic coaching training, however, and I see L&D teams fall into this trap regularly. It must be role and AI specific for people to apply easily.

Step 5: Create a Culture of Experimentation

The organisations moving fastest with AI are often not the most advanced technically, but they creating environments where people feel safe to learn. That means:

  • Rewarding curiosity
  • Normalising experimentation
  • Reducing fear around mistakes by not reprimanding innocent mistakes
  • Treating AI adoption as an ongoing capability journey and not a one off training programme

AI confidence is built through usage and usage only grows where psychological safety exists.

AI Adoption Is Human

Many organisations are still approaching AI primarily through the lens of productivity. And don’t get me wrong, productivity absolutely matters.

But the organisations that succeed long term will recognise something bigger. AI adoption is fundamentally about people. It is about helping humans build confidence in a rapidly changing environment. It’s about helping leaders lead differently and helping employees think differently. 

This is because the future of work is not human or AI. It is human + AI interaction at scale. 

And the organisations that master that interaction layer first will not just adopt AI more successfully, they will build more adaptable, more confident and more future-ready workforces in the process.

Meta Description

Most AI adoption strategies fail because they focus on tools instead of behaviour. Learn how to build an AI adoption playbook that drives engagement, confidence, and sustainable AI usage across your workforce.

Erica Farmer headshot

Erica Farmer is an expert speaker on People First AI Adoption in HR & Leadership and the Creator of the AI Dividend™ Approach. She delivers keynotes and practical workshops, and is the author of ‘AI for People Professionals’.